Stress Analysis of High-Pressure Steam Header Manifold from Power Boiler to Distribution System Piping Using The Caesar II Software

Wanda Kurniawan, Made Rahmawaty

Abstract


In the construction of the oleochemical plant project, there is a steam pipe that experiences excessive stress during the stress analysis phase using stress analysis software. The pipe is connected to either a boiler or a steam generator equipment. Recalculation is necessary, including for the allowable pipe span and pipe flexibility, to address the excessive stress. The pipe falls into the category of critical pipe, thus requiring stress analysis after the recalculation is performed. The stress analysis is conducted using sustained load, occasional load, and thermal load based on ASME B31.3. The calculation of the allowable pipe span takes the smallest value between the minimum distance based on stress limit and deflection limit, which is 19,006 ft, and the minimum required number of supports, which is 22. The results of the calculation for the allowable pipe span are acceptable as the number of supports meets the minimum required amount. The flexibility calculation yields a value smaller than K1, specifically 0.000916, indicating that the pipe is declared flexible. The highest stress value at node 688 for sustained load is 18,389.3 psi, and the highest value at node 688 for occasional load, it is 18,399 psi. The highest stress value for thermal load, 1420.6 psi, is found at node 168. The stress values for all three load cases do not exceed the allowable stresses. Therefore, the design is declared safe during operation

Keywords


Allowable Span; Flexibility; Occasional Load; Sustain Load; Thermal Load

Full Text:

PDF

References


DNV-RP-D101. (2008). Structural Analysis of Piping Sistems. Havik, Norway.

IDPipe. 2014. Indonesian Piping Knowledge. Indonesian Piping Knowledge: www.idpipe.com.

Vakharia D.P., 2009. Determination of maximum span between pipe supports using maximum bending stress theory. Int Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, Vol 1 (6): 46-49.

Mahardhika, P. (2017). Penentuan Allowable Span antar Penyangga Pipa SLF Berdasarkan Tegangan, Defleksi dan Frekuensi Alami. Jurnal Iptek, Volume 21.2, pp. 27-34.

Greer, B., Harper, C., Rahnama, R. (2012). Improved Thermal Piping Analysis for Reciprocating Compressor Piping Systems. Austin: BETA Machinery.

Kannappan, Sam. (1986). Introduction for Pipe Stress Analysis. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Rani, M. J., Ramanthan, K. (2016). Design and Analysis of Piping System with Supports Using CAESAR-II. International Journal of Computer and Systems Engineering. Vol. 10, No.5. pp 980 – 984.

Mahardhika, P. (2018). Analisis Symetrical dan Nonsymetrical Vertical Expansion Loop untuk Meningkatkan Fleksibilitas dan Menurunkan Tegangan Pipa Berdasarkan ASME B31.3. Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Kerekayasaan, Volume 42.1, pp 63-70. [online]. Tersedia di: http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/teknik

Tijara, P. (2004). Pelatihan Dasar Analisis Tegangan Menggunakan Software COADE CAESAR II. PT. Tijara Pratama.

Tauladhan, G., Husodo, A.W., Mahardhika, P. (2018). Analisis Desain Pipa GRP pada Line Discharge UF Backwash Pump Dengan Vertical Loop (Studi Kasus Unit Pengolahan Water Treatment PLTU Unit 2-1 X 1000 Mw Cirebon). 6th Conference on Piping Engineering and Its Application, pp. 103-108.

ASME. (2016). ASME B31.3 Process Piping. NewYork: TheAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers.

Crocker, S. 1945. Piping Handbook Fourth Edition. New York: McGraw Hill Co.

Chamsudi, A. (2005). Piping Stress Analisys. Diktat - Piping Stress Analisys. Jakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31284/j.iptek.2023.v27i2.4652

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.